Collaboration is no more File/Folder Sharing, it is more information sharing. If I can share a industrial drawing as a drawing and not as a file, it is collaboration. File as a medium has to move out and contextual object should become the medium.Twitter changed the mail as a medium for sharing message to the message itself as a medium.
Found one supporting link to my view
http://www.technologyreview.com/business/35077/?mod=related
Today everyone thinks collaboration is done if I have a tool like teaming (in general teaming,not related to Novell Teaming) or a software to share files seamlessly with others. Those are just tools and these tools existing even before collaboration became a hot topic by itself. Today we are just enhancing the existing IM/Mail/traditional file share/wiki/blog to makes things more automated and integrated. Having a team space in a teaming site is not going to solve the collaboration problem or having a video conference is not a solution. Every organization does this kind of software, thinking that is the future. Agreed that those tools eases certain manual process. Is a meeting via teaming site as effective and productive as a meet-room one? Why do still me prefer a meetroom to discuss stuff, is it privacy? Why do we still have conferences held by various organizations and people travel?
Face-time is more valuable than an online meeting. We need tools to aid the collaboration and not be the way to collaborate.
In past and current present everyone end up creating an appointment, selecting a meeting place, send across documents via mail/appt, wait in the meeting room till everyone turns up. If not, call them and remind them to come to meeting once the meeting is started. People might state that the attachment was too big and mail was not received. People might have made updates to the presentations, attached documents post the appt was sent and may more issues.
Today with teaming, the originator has to create the teaming site, invite people, upload files etc. The members invited might have to get used to teaming site, be online or subscribe to feeds, download files, update and upload etc. New tools have to be learnt. Teaming site doesn't provide any face time, whoever is online gets information that is updated or can update. And today team changes, people work on various assignments, assignments changes, within team the team structure changes, there are dynamic teams. Lets take BBC, it has journalists who travel every day to collect news and have to interact with sub-teams in each place/city they travel to. Forming a single teaming site or multiple teaming site/workspaces do not work on dynamic nature. Change will always be there - forever.
Tomorrow, For example, Kalis wants to call for a meeting @9am, the only thing Kalis has to do is to use his smart phone, select the list of people who needs to know about the meeting and just select "MEET". The collaborator system should automatically generate calender events for the people (no email tool here) in their smart phone, set reminders, send SMS, select a place to meet and book that place. Selecting a place is interesting, as the place selection in real-world should a place where the people are more comfortable meeting or a place where most people could reach in time.
I If the meeting is in between a set of team members and a set of partner team members, then the place will be a common official recommended location (for ex: a common board room)f Kalis selects a set of his friends for meeting, the system should ideally select a place like a restaurant and book a table, while if it is a set of team members, then it should book a meeting room which is available at that time in the office. Basically the idea is to auto select a place where the meeting will run comfortabily.
If the meeting requires certain data to be available for the members, then it should automatically generate a share area and give exclusive access to those people. Here Kalis doesn't need to create a teaming site and invite people, upload files etc. The meeting just happens in the designated place. The common data area is editiable and everyone gets the latest data before and after the meeting.
If members have back to back meetings, then the collaborator should select a place where everyone could reach in equal time and may be delay the meeting time by few minutes, like 9:03 or 9:05 based on the distance of the next meeting destination and the current one.
The place selection becomes more interesting if a sub-set of members are not in the same place. Here based on the GPS location of the members, the collaborator should either decide to start a video conferencing (real-time) to the meeting room or to the smart phone of other sub-set itself (now-a-days smart phone come with a camera on the screen side).
Day-after, if the user is not available at the meeting place, then provide an optical illusion of the person. The person might be driving, but is still present in the meeting room explaining stuff (better to pull-over, if driving - hah, day-after we have computer controlled driving, so no need to pull-over).
Collaborator(if I have to call one) is an fuzzy service that makes decisions leveraging various available technologies. Here messaging, calender events, reminders, conferencing, data sharing are just tools which aid the collaboration and they are not collaboration by themselves.
This might be totally funny or wierd as of today...
Found one supporting link to my view
http://www.technologyreview.com/business/35077/?mod=related
Today everyone thinks collaboration is done if I have a tool like teaming (in general teaming,not related to Novell Teaming) or a software to share files seamlessly with others. Those are just tools and these tools existing even before collaboration became a hot topic by itself. Today we are just enhancing the existing IM/Mail/traditional file share/wiki/blog to makes things more automated and integrated. Having a team space in a teaming site is not going to solve the collaboration problem or having a video conference is not a solution. Every organization does this kind of software, thinking that is the future. Agreed that those tools eases certain manual process. Is a meeting via teaming site as effective and productive as a meet-room one? Why do still me prefer a meetroom to discuss stuff, is it privacy? Why do we still have conferences held by various organizations and people travel?
Face-time is more valuable than an online meeting. We need tools to aid the collaboration and not be the way to collaborate.
In past and current present everyone end up creating an appointment, selecting a meeting place, send across documents via mail/appt, wait in the meeting room till everyone turns up. If not, call them and remind them to come to meeting once the meeting is started. People might state that the attachment was too big and mail was not received. People might have made updates to the presentations, attached documents post the appt was sent and may more issues.
Today with teaming, the originator has to create the teaming site, invite people, upload files etc. The members invited might have to get used to teaming site, be online or subscribe to feeds, download files, update and upload etc. New tools have to be learnt. Teaming site doesn't provide any face time, whoever is online gets information that is updated or can update. And today team changes, people work on various assignments, assignments changes, within team the team structure changes, there are dynamic teams. Lets take BBC, it has journalists who travel every day to collect news and have to interact with sub-teams in each place/city they travel to. Forming a single teaming site or multiple teaming site/workspaces do not work on dynamic nature. Change will always be there - forever.
Tomorrow, For example, Kalis wants to call for a meeting @9am, the only thing Kalis has to do is to use his smart phone, select the list of people who needs to know about the meeting and just select "MEET". The collaborator system should automatically generate calender events for the people (no email tool here) in their smart phone, set reminders, send SMS, select a place to meet and book that place. Selecting a place is interesting, as the place selection in real-world should a place where the people are more comfortable meeting or a place where most people could reach in time.
I If the meeting is in between a set of team members and a set of partner team members, then the place will be a common official recommended location (for ex: a common board room)f Kalis selects a set of his friends for meeting, the system should ideally select a place like a restaurant and book a table, while if it is a set of team members, then it should book a meeting room which is available at that time in the office. Basically the idea is to auto select a place where the meeting will run comfortabily.
If the meeting requires certain data to be available for the members, then it should automatically generate a share area and give exclusive access to those people. Here Kalis doesn't need to create a teaming site and invite people, upload files etc. The meeting just happens in the designated place. The common data area is editiable and everyone gets the latest data before and after the meeting.
If members have back to back meetings, then the collaborator should select a place where everyone could reach in equal time and may be delay the meeting time by few minutes, like 9:03 or 9:05 based on the distance of the next meeting destination and the current one.
The place selection becomes more interesting if a sub-set of members are not in the same place. Here based on the GPS location of the members, the collaborator should either decide to start a video conferencing (real-time) to the meeting room or to the smart phone of other sub-set itself (now-a-days smart phone come with a camera on the screen side).
Day-after, if the user is not available at the meeting place, then provide an optical illusion of the person. The person might be driving, but is still present in the meeting room explaining stuff (better to pull-over, if driving - hah, day-after we have computer controlled driving, so no need to pull-over).
Collaborator(if I have to call one) is an fuzzy service that makes decisions leveraging various available technologies. Here messaging, calender events, reminders, conferencing, data sharing are just tools which aid the collaboration and they are not collaboration by themselves.
This might be totally funny or wierd as of today...
No comments:
Post a Comment